Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge
  • Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:40:01 +0100

On Tuesday 07 of February 2012 11:36:55 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2012-02-07T11:16:Ladislav Hagara:
> > any plan with /usr merge [1]?
> > Personally I don't like it but I am a realist. We have no chance to
> > change the upstream.
> > New versions of crucial upstream packages rely on /usr merge.
> > Do we want to use devel-udev-kmod git branch by the same way as
> > devel-xorg-modular or we plan to integrate it soon?
>
> As this is only a Fedora idiocy I see no reason to follow it at all.
I agree and also don't see it as inevitable. Do they think upstream will go
"well, since we have a merged /usr now, let's change all our build scripts to
install to /bin instead of /usr/bin etc."?

LP
--
To err is humor




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page