sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

[SM-Discuss] /usr merge

From: Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz>
To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:16:01 +0100

Hi,

any plan with /usr merge [1]?
Personally I don't like it but I am a realist. We have no chance to
change the upstream.
New versions of crucial upstream packages rely on /usr merge.
Do we want to use devel-udev-kmod git branch by the same way as
devel-xorg-modular or we plan to integrate it soon?

[1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge

--
Ladislav Hagara

[SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Ladislav Hagara, 02/07/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, flux, 02/07/2012
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, David Kowis, 02/07/2012
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, flux, 02/07/2012
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Sukneet Basuta, 02/07/2012
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, flux, 02/08/2012
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Ismael Luceno, 02/26/2012
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Ismael Luceno, 02/26/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 02/07/2012
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Jaka Kranjc, 02/07/2012
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] /usr merge, Robin Cook, 02/07/2012