Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] kde-4.7

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Bor Kraljič <pyrobor AT ver.si>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] kde-4.7
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:30:54 +0200

On Tuesday 24 of May 2011 13:30:44 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> As you may know, KDE has just released the first beta of kde-4.7.
> There are many more tarballs for this release than for previous versions of
> kde, as they correspond to the new split git repos.
>
> In particular, kdegraphics and and kdeedu have multiple modules. Also kate
> and
> konsole now have a separate existence.
>
> I have some local spells for much of this, which build directly from local
> git
> repos. I have been building these on a regular basis for some time. I never
> pushed these spells, as they were intended for a rather special usage case,
> however, they do have the relevent conflicts and dependencies. I could now
> push
> this stuff to a new devel-kde-4.7 branch as a starting point if someone
> else
> would like to add the SOURCE, SOURCE_URL, SOURCEHASH entries which are
> currently absent.
>
> For example:
>
> SPELL=marble
> SPELLX=kde-edu/$SPELL
> VERSION=master
> SOURCE_DIRECTORY="$BUILD_DIRECTORY/$SPELL-$VERSION"
> WEB_SITE=http://www.kde.org
> ENTERED=20110218
> # SECURITY_PATCH=1
> LICENSE[0]=GPL
> KEYWORDS="kde4"
> SHORT="a virtual globe for kde4"
> cat << EOF
> a virtual globe fro kde
> EOF
>
>
>
>
> $ ls kde4-graphics/
> FUNCTIONS kcolorchooser kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer ksaneplugin
> libkexiv2
> libkmap skanlite
> gwenview KDE_CONFIGURE kgamma ksnapshot
> libkface
> libksane svgpart
> kamera KDE_DEPENDS kolourpaint libkdcraw libkipi
>
> okular
>
> $ ls kde4-edu/
> cantor kalgebra KDE_CONFIGURE kmplot libkdeedu rocs
> FUNCTIONS kalzium KDE_DEPENDS kstars marble step
>
>
> Any thoughts?

Branches are cheap! And this will absolutly help the person who will make
spells for stable releases. (That guy will probably be me :) )

I say push the branch. Sharing the code can't hurt!

regards, Bor

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page