sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO
- From: David Haley <khoralin AT gmail.com>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:13:00 -0600
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM, flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
Several weeks for both.
Have not experienced any problems with either kernel in my time using them.
I'm currently testing out 2.6.32.4 on one of my systems, and it seems
stable thus far (though I ran into an issue with having security labels
enabled for the reiser filesystem).
I'd like to get a consensus of just how stable this kernel is and
evaluate it for the potential of being the new kernel on the ISO. I am
therefore calling on all developers who have experience with the 2.6.32
series (and in particular with the .4 version) to tell me the following:
* which kernels you have run (in the 2.6.32 series, yes tell me all the
numbers you have experience with)
2.6.23.0, 2.6.32.2
* how stable each of the kernels has been for you
Haven't had any problems with either.
* what hardware you have run the kernels on
AMD Athlon X2 4800
2GB RAM
Asus Mobo, nVidia2 chipset
2GB RAM
Asus Mobo, nVidia2 chipset
* what filesystems, security options, etc. you use with it (or have
enabled in the kernel)
* how long you have run/been running each of the kernels
Several weeks for both.
* if you experienced problems/bugs, what were they? How serious? Are
there (relatively) easy workarounds you know of?
Have not experienced any problems with either kernel in my time using them.
I thank you all in advance for any information you can offer me in this.
Here's to hoping that the 2.6.32 series really is the new "stable"
series!
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
flux, 01/21/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO, Arwed von Merkatz, 01/21/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO, Eric Sandall, 01/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
flux, 01/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/21/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO, flux, 01/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
Ladislav Hagara, 01/21/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO,
flux, 01/21/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Evaluation of 2.6.32.4 as possible new kernel on ISO, David Haley, 01/22/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.