sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:27:48 -0600
On Dec 04, Vasil Yonkov [bustervill AT yahoo.com] wrote:
> This raises an another question - after git is such a good method for
> update, why do we stick to the tarballs? It's a sluggish method. I don't
> know how it is on the server side, but I'm pretty sure that it uses a lot
> of bandwidth (compared to git) - everyone, on every update have to
> download around 6MB.
It's not as straightforward to have git available from download mirrors,
though the intention has been to get something reliable setup for at least
the mirrors where we can have a git http server installed.
Also the noted signing issues.
Attachment:
pgpows7n3q5EH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] the update process,
Vasil Yonkov, 12/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Jeremy Blosser, 12/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Martin Spitzbarth, 12/05/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process, Jeremy Blosser, 12/05/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Martin Spitzbarth, 12/05/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Kajikawa Jeremy, 12/04/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process, Jeremy Blosser, 12/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Jeremy Blosser, 12/04/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process, Jeremy Blosser, 12/04/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] the update process,
Jaka Kranjc, 12/04/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.