sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:53:01 -0700
Quoting "Bearcat M. Sandor" <bearcat AT feline-soul.net>:
<snip>
Well, i have a working x-server system, yet dbus has an optional dependancy on X11-LIBS. Yet it tells me (0) [none]. How is that possible? Do i need
to cast xorg-libs (i doubt that) or is the dbus spell and possibly others screwed up?
I have no idea how you are getting that if you are using the devel-xorg-modular branch, which is the only location where my changes were pushed.
$ git checkout xorg-modular
gaze DEPENDS dbus
Switched to branch "xorg-modular"
$ gaze DEPENDS dbus
depends pkgconfig &&
depends expat '--with-xml=expat' &&
optional_depends xorg-libs \
'-with-x11' \
'-without-x11' \
'X11 support' &&
...
$ git checkout master
!gaze
git checkout gcc
Switched to branch "master"
$ gaze DEPENDS dbus
depends pkgconfig &&
depends expat '--with-xml=expat' &&
optional_depends X11-LIBS \
'-with-x11' \
'-without-x11' \
'X11 support' &&
...
So what are you using? Where did you get it? Do you have a provider of X11-LIBS installed (as listed in `gaze provides X11-LIBS`)? If you recast dbus and say 'n' to using [none], does it give you a list of X11-LIBS providers to select? My guess is, at some point, you told dbus to not use any X11-LIBS providers and it's remembering that.
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-
[SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/20/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 03/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.