sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <bearcat AT feline-soul.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:24:34 -0700
On Thursday 20 March 2008 23:20:24 Eric Sandall wrote: > On Thursday 20 March 2008 23:11:42 Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote: > > On 02:46:20 2008-03-21 "Bearcat M. Sandor" <bearcat AT feline-soul.com> wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > i recently updated my git grimore with the latest xorg-modular spells. > > > My mouse is all sorts of messed up, but that's beside the point. > > > > > > In trying to fix it, i recast dbus i am told i have no providers of > > > X11-LIBS. In #sourcemage the bot tells you that xorg-server provides > > > it, but it does not. Xorg-server provides X11-SERVER. What would seem > > > to provide it is xorg-libs but this latest git pull has exiled it. > > > > > > Something is a miss here. > > > > I changed nothing in that regards... you might have hit sandalle's work > > though... That could break it... All I did was update the versions and > > test cast them :) > > > > And last I checked xorg-server also provides X11-LIBS... if it does not > > it's a valid BUG... BTW xorg-libs is just a profile spell it doesn't > > install anything... just depends on a few libs... Hopefully once we get > > rid of the monolithic providers we can drop the X11-LIBS and X11-SERVER > > providers as well as everything will depends on specific libs... > > To simplify, xorg-server now depends on xorg-libs and no longer provides > X11-LIBS. Why? It doesn't actually provide X11-LIBS, but instead depends on > other stuff that provides X11-LIBS. > > As for breakage, my changes *should* not be causing that as I changed all > apps to directly depend upon the proper packages and no longer using the > X11-* providers. The packages have been left providing X11-* for other > grimoires (e.g. games) to continue to work until this (some day) hits > stable. > > Feel free to "cleanup" my changes, but no one else was doing it and it's > been over a year, so I did. > > -sandalle Well, i have a working x-server system, yet dbus has an optional dependancy on X11-LIBS. Yet it tells me (0) [none]. How is that possible? Do i need to cast xorg-libs (i doubt that) or is the dbus spell and possibly others screwed up? -- Bearcat M. Sandor Bearcat AT feline-soul.net Jabber: bearcat AT feline-soul.net MSN: bearcatsandor AT hotmail.com Yahoo: bearcatsandor AIM: bearcatmsandor |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/20/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 03/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.