sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up

From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:49:17 -0700

On Friday 21 March 2008 06:22:53 Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
<snip>
> Erm, if "all apps" now depend on "the proper libraries", does this mean
> that xorg-monolithic users can no longer cast many X apps?

These changes are not in test, but the devel-xorg-modular branch. If you are
using that branch then you are not using monolithic xorg.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/20/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 03/21/2008
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Ethan Grammatikidis, 03/21/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Bearcat M. Sandor, 03/21/2008
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Xorg-modular and PROVIDES seem screwed up, Eric Sandall, 03/21/2008