sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:06:26 -0600
Quoting flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>:
First of all, the welcome screen describing the back and "next" commands
is easy to understand. The "list-steps" ans "jump ..." are helpful, but
I have forgotten their names about three steps into the installation.
I could rembember "todo" after about 20 seconds of thinking about it.
An "introduction" command that prints the welcome screen again would be
useful ("help" is already taken by bash).
You are not alone in having this problem. Others have reported the same
issue. I had already renamed "list-steps" to "steps" in development to
try and make it easier to remember, but definitely we need some
help-listing command. I'm not sure it should be called though, as
"introduction" seems counter-intuitive, as do the names I can think up
at present. The best would of course be help, which is taken. Something
like "commands" maybe? Can I get a consensus from the list here as to
what the best name would be? The vote is on! :)
Override help so it displays what we want. A simple message with a way to get back at the builtin help would be sufficient.
As long as there is not much space left on the welcome screen I
wouldn't mention it, but one or two lines about setting the keyboard
layout would be nice, especially before setting the root password.
Noted. This is being worked on.
We could change PS1 to something like
"disk-format (step 2 of 10)n root@smgl-install:/$ "
to give the user some feedback on the progress of the installation.
Notice the n newline, printing the status information into the same
line as the "usual" bash prompt may be confusing to some users.
I like this idea! It's a nice simple solution. In fact, while we're at
it something like "$CURSTEP ($X of $TOTAL) type commands for a list of
commandsn root@smgl-install:$PWD #" would be even better! Then we don't
need to worry about the user remembering what they need to type to see a
list of commands, because it will be printed at each prompt for them,
and this would only take up 1 extra line of screen real-estate, which I
don't think is a problem. Thanks for the suggestion!
Yeah that's a good idea. Perhaps even a current step/next step type thing.
I'd like to see that, rather than step 4 of 6. It'd be better to see something like:
Current: partition-disks Next: format-disks$/root
The username and hostname aren't really even necessary in this simple install CD.
If it's saying "you should be able to reboot now" Then I'd assume all the disks are unmounted. If that's done, then you really can reboot now. Might mention ejecting the CD, but most people are smart enough to realize that.
The message "You should be able to reboot now." at the end of the
installer is a bit misleading. I kind of expect from a source mage user
that s/he doesn't simply press the reset button on the pc, but we could
be more clear about it.
Noted.
The user is completely left alone after logging in as root. I suggest
we place some lines in /etc/motd to tell the user about setting up the
network using netconf, updating sorcery and the grimoires, setting
sorcery options and doing a sorcery rebuild.
We're working on this. There's some concern over what exactly would be
the best way to handle this. It will be resolved for stable though.
I mentioned a onetime run script with a README file in /root
It'd run the first time root logs in. Display that there's a README file (or maybe less the README for them, but that's kinda annoying)
I was a bit irritated that my network cards were eth5 and eth6. That's
because /etc/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules contain the mac addresses
of some Xen interfaces. We should remove those entries for the final
iso.
Ah! I will now hunt this down and kill it with prejudice! I don't know
how this got in the ISO though. I don't have Xen.
That's due to cruft building up in our chroot building process. We're not cleaning up after ourselves well enough when we're building our stable chroots. The stable-basesystem-0.16 tarball is actually missing shadow! And it's got the Xen interfaces in there, which shouldn't be there as well.
lessee if horde can generate a valid pgp signature today...
--
David Kowis
==================================================================
| www.ronpaul2008.com | www.sourcemage.org |
| Ron Paul for President! | SourceMage GNU/Linux |
==================================================================
Attachment:
pgpyP1zaoBC64.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
flux, 01/20/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, flux, 01/20/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
Martin Spitzbarth, 01/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
flux, 01/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, Jaka Kranjc, 01/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, Remko van der Vossen, 01/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
David Kowis, 01/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
Martin Spitzbarth, 01/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, David Kowis, 01/21/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, flux, 01/23/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/23/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
David Kowis, 01/23/2008
-
[SM-Discuss] ISO docs and issues (was: Please test new devel ISO),
Karsten Behrmann, 01/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO docs and issues (was: Please test new devel ISO), Eric Sandall, 01/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO docs and issues (was: Please test new devel ISO), Thomas Orgis, 01/24/2008
-
[SM-Discuss] ISO docs and issues (was: Please test new devel ISO),
Karsten Behrmann, 01/23/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
David Kowis, 01/23/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
Martin Spitzbarth, 01/21/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO, Eric Sandall, 01/23/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Please test new devel ISO,
flux, 01/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.