Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] haskell-devel section

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] haskell-devel section
  • Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:59:54 +0200

On 22:21:40 2007-08-10 David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
> Alexander Tsamutali wrote:
> > В Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:44:32 -0700
> > Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> пишет:
> >
> >> in the end it's up to whomever submits them (e.g. you ;)).
> >
> > I disagree here. This way will possibly lead to a mess in the
> > grimoire. We should avoid it by making some agreement on naming
> > scheme, documenting it somewhere and controlling each other when new
> > haskell spells appear.
> >
>
> I don't think haskell-foo is too bad. Most likely they'll be
> dependencies of something else. so you'll cast haskell-something which
> will need a pile of haskell-somethings ?
>
> I dunno, don't mind typing so much :) Helps keep things understandable.
> hs- isn't too bad either.
>

I'd suggest haskell-

It would reduce any confusion to where it belongs. And there is previous
usage of it: php-pear section has all packages prefixed with pear-

--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.

Key id = F4C1F89C
Key fingerprint = 6FF2 8F20 4C9D DB36 B5B6 F134 884D 72CC F4C1 F89C





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page