sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:35:37 +0100
Am Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:59:18 -0800
schrieb Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>:
> OR, a simpler approach. ;)
>
> Sync up with test, and revert these:
> commit adbab1098ff1a2dd9f1eff2882cb6b47c1066ca7
> Author: Thomas Orgis <sobukus AT sourcemage.org>
> Date: Thu Nov 2 20:12:10 2006 +0100
>
> dmsetup in init.d/mountall.sh failing is not fatal (simply no dm in
> kernel),
>
> commit 772f276d53fecceaf68441af953afc041887da62
> Author: Thomas Orgis <sobukus AT sourcemage.org>
> Date: Sun Oct 29 14:39:03 2006 +0100
>
> enable device mapper nodes discovery in init.d/mountall.sh
>
> Assuming those are the two changes that break LVM.
Can someone please explain me what I did in October / November to cause
that LVM breaking?
I am aware of http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9177 and that has
its last comment from July!
Also please someone point out the point where LVM is cracked in these diffs::
--- a/smgl/init.d/init.d/mountall.sh
+++ b/smgl/init.d/init.d/mountall.sh
@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ # bug 7311
builtin echo 'none /proc proc rw 0 0' >> /etc/mtab
fi
+ # find devices that were set up in initramfs/rd
+ if optional_executable /sbin/dmsetup
+ then
+ echo "(re)creating device mapper nodes"
+ /sbin/dmsetup mknodes
+ evaluate_retval
+ fi
+
if optional_executable /sbin/vgscan && optional_executable /sbin/vgchange
; then
echo -n "Scanning for and initializing all available LVM volume
groups..."
/sbin/vgscan --ignorelockingfailure --mknodes &&
--- a/smgl/init.d/init.d/mountall.sh
+++ b/smgl/init.d/init.d/mountall.sh
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ # bug 7311
if optional_executable /sbin/dmsetup
then
echo "(re)creating device mapper nodes"
+ # won't check retval because kernel just may lack device mapper
/sbin/dmsetup mknodes
- evaluate_retval
fi
if optional_executable /sbin/vgscan && optional_executable /sbin/vgchange
; then
I must assume that you picked the wrong commits by accident... or is there
indeed a dmsetup mknodes preventing vgscan to succeed?
Thomas.
-
[SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Eric Sandall, 11/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d, David Kowis, 11/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Jaka Kranjc, 11/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d, Eric Sandall, 11/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Eric Sandall, 11/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d, Flavien Bridault, 11/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Thomas Orgis, 11/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d, Jeremy Blosser, 11/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/21/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d, David Kowis, 11/22/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Jeremy Blosser, 11/21/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable-rc-0.6 and init.d,
Eric Sandall, 11/15/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.