Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] grimoire qa random facts

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Flavien Bridault <vlaaad AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] grimoire qa random facts
  • Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:13:37 +0200

Le mercredi 18 octobre 2006 à 14:54 +0200, Jaka Kranjc a écrit :
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 02:50, David Kowis wrote:
> > That's assuming we are cleaning out the integration requests before
> > starting the contest... I, personally, would.
> A bit OT, sandalle has been diligently gatekeeping the last few days. Very
> nice Eric!
> I'd clean it them too if it is possible, otherwise it will be hard to
> search
> for bugs that are not already fixed (see below).

I heard in an another thread that current stable-rc is obsolete and will
be soon erased by the current test. Some are these integration requests
not useless ?

> we're now at 52 bugs pending integrations and 226 bugs pending gatekeeper
> review. This is quite an improvement since two months ago [0], when the
> numbers were 14 and 182. The total count has slightly increased though and
> those 278 fixes are only in test atm.
>
> (the reply has grown too much off-topic, so I branched it)
>
> emrys: anything new with the git transition? Should integrations still be
> avoided?
>
> This is also a major problem:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2006-October/015541.html
> without this resolved, we can't easily give people a quickfix bugs link,
> since
> we cannot exclude the already fixed ones. Such an initiative proved useful
> at
> the last release.
> Not to mention it affects gurus the most.
>
> And with the new release, we can archive the old stable as emrys suggested
> in
> the graveyard thread and do some healthy pruning. This would also improve
> the
> grimoire quality. :) And if we're throwing stable away, I don't see how the
> stable-only integrations would mess with git history.
>
> I have also plans [1] to someday utilise something like
> http://www.commit-digest.org/issues/2006-10-15/statistics/ for us. I think
> this would not only also stimulate fixing like the suggested contest, but
> would also give a nice weekly overview. That digest in particular is
> generated from bugzilla data at https://bugs.kde.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi
> (which is a nice summary in itself). I've been directed to the scripts
> behind
> it and the bugzilla part of the commit-digest (this previous link) should
> work, the commit not, as they use svn (and i didn't get that code either).
>
> [0] https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2006-August/015188.html
> [1] will file a bug sometime
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Flavien Bridault

Disk, Graphics, Graphics-libs sections Guru
Source Mage GNU/Linux - http://www.sourcemage.org

irc: vlaaad
jabber: vlaaad AT amessage.be

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page