Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] process for getting bugfixes and security updates into stable grimoire

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] process for getting bugfixes and security updates into stable grimoire
  • Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:50:58 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
<snip>
> Yeah, I realized that after writing.
> In general VERIFIED + CLOSED is a good idea. The problem is that not
> everyone verifies fixed bugs, so how about we define a time period after
> which a bug is assumed verified and can be closed? Say a month after it
> got FIXED?
>
A month seems our standard for waiting, so yes. Perhaps try to have
someone besides the fixer try to verify if the reporter is non-responsive.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEY2tyHXt9dKjv3WERAjvrAKDJsSA8cC+qJRgghSga0qXbQF1z5wCgjATf
/LFR/AkA6zHGfKYFCzastAI=
=06GS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page