Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>]

Let me add that I'm no expert in snv at all. In fact I barely know it.
I'm just totally in favor of dropping p4 (for the licence issue).
So testing whatever scm will suit me (actually I'm quite interested in
git) but I know I'll get some easy help from Pieter with svn, that's why
I volunteered for that one. :)

Cheers,
Mathieu.

On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 13, Andra?? ruskie Levstik [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> > Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
> > > The current identified SCMs to try are git, svk, and svn.  git is most
> > > similar to bzr (which the other teams are already using) and has a very
> > > robust feature set.  svk is most similar to p4.  svn is probably in the
> > > widest general community use.   Is this the right list?  Do we have some
> > > volunteer gurus/sections for each? 
> > > 
> > 
> > games and games-devel for svk
> 
> On Apr 13, Arwed von Merkatz [v.merkatz AT gmx.net] wrote:
> > I think that's a good list, it covers most of the types of SCMs.
> > I guess for svn Pieter (e-type) or Mathieu (lejatorn) might be
> > interested :)
> 
> IMO it would make (more) sense to have people that aren't already
> proponents of each SCM using them.  Have the experts use them too if they
> want and be available to help with stuff, but if we just have the experts
> use the SCM they like we're not going to learn much.  Any SCM can probably
> do what we need when someone that knows it is using it.
> 
> This is one reason I'm planning to do most of the initial admin setup on
> fawkes myself, that way I can give a comparison of each from the admin
> point of view without having much prior experience with any of them.
> 
> Planning to work on that this next week, by the way... the other project I
> was working on this weekend is wrapping up and has gone pretty well so far.



> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss