sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:34:14 -0500
Guess I would be willing to try git for the gnome2-libs and gnome2-apps.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:46 -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Apr 13, Andra?? ruskie Levstik [ruskie AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> > Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
> > > The current identified SCMs to try are git, svk, and svn. git is most
> > > similar to bzr (which the other teams are already using) and has a very
> > > robust feature set. svk is most similar to p4. svn is probably in the
> > > widest general community use. Is this the right list? Do we have some
> > > volunteer gurus/sections for each?
> > >
> >
> > games and games-devel for svk
>
> On Apr 13, Arwed von Merkatz [v.merkatz AT gmx.net] wrote:
> > I think that's a good list, it covers most of the types of SCMs.
> > I guess for svn Pieter (e-type) or Mathieu (lejatorn) might be
> > interested :)
>
> IMO it would make (more) sense to have people that aren't already
> proponents of each SCM using them. Have the experts use them too if they
> want and be available to help with stuff, but if we just have the experts
> use the SCM they like we're not going to learn much. Any SCM can probably
> do what we need when someone that knows it is using it.
>
> This is one reason I'm planning to do most of the initial admin setup on
> fawkes myself, that way I can give a comparison of each from the admin
> point of view without having much prior experience with any of them.
>
> Planning to work on that this next week, by the way... the other project I
> was working on this weekend is wrapping up and has gone pretty well so far.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 04/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Mathieu L., 04/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Robin Cook, 04/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Arwed von Merkatz, 04/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Mathieu L., 04/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Pieter Lenaerts, 04/13/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Mathieu L., 04/12/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Stephan Erb, 04/17/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Stephan Erb, 04/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 04/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Arwed von Merkatz, 04/27/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps, Eric Sandall, 04/28/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] scm next steps,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 04/12/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.