Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: "Mathieu L." <lejatorn AT smgl.homelinux.net>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance
  • Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Mathieu L. wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:20:26AM +0200, Andrew ruskie Levstik wrote:

How do the rest of you who have an opinion feel about this? A question yet
to answer would be who would have either read or write access to the wiki.


I say all devels have rw; also have the ability to assign anonymously editable
pages as well. And imho all have read access(we do support and openly
reviewable
by anyone development proccess).

I'd say not all devel but only those who have asked for will have rw on
the wiki. No need to include everyone if only a few of us care about
providing documentation.
Besides that I totally agree on the other points.

Correct (IMO ;)). The developer should have to ask for an account
(e.g. via a 'register' or 'create account' option which Moinmoin
already has), but that account (as I mention in another e-mail) will
have to be 'approved' by one of the wiki admins (most likely the Team
Leads).

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXS69HXt9dKjv3WERAmqFAKCjx7799M/FqfiicBj/ih4N4FKhiQCeKkQi
aVhTUmPIzmVd0tMb8iMuzTI=
=Lx1G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page