Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance
  • Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:20:26 +0200

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
>
> 1. We should continue to maintain a wiki for developing documentations,
> specifications, policies, etc; basically, the wiki will be the
> developer-facing web place to propose things and work on them til
> they're complete.
>

Agreed... Not all of use are webdesigners/content editors. I write stuff
so that it's documented... I don't bother with the final look much...

> 2. When things on the wiki are complete, they should get moved to the
> Drupal
> site. The Drupal site will be the public-facing site, with only final
> content. It will combine this content with forums, blogs, and other
> user-facing functions that Drupal integrates well.
>

Sounds great... and will finnaly give the tome team some work to do...

> 3. It should be the individual Team Leads' responsibility to make sure
> things in their areas of the wiki that are complete get moved to the
> Drupal site in a timely manner. The Tome team and the Project
> Lead/Asst. Project Lead will be available to help with this, but it
> will be the TL's job to make sure it gets done. Drupal will remain
> editable only by those who have edit permissions, which includes the
> Tome team, the Leads, and their designees.
>

No objection here...

> How do the rest of you who have an opinion feel about this? A question yet
> to answer would be who would have either read or write access to the wiki.
>

I say all devels have rw; also have the ability to assign anonymously editable
pages as well. And imho all have read access(we do support and openly
reviewable
by anyone development proccess).

> We would want to make it useful for what it's intended for without creating
> a scenario where it just takes over the role of the Drupal site for
> content, because that just makes the Tome team's job harder. The most
> draconian approach would be to only allow registered developers to read and
> write the dev wiki. A more open approach would be to let anyone read it
> and any registered user approved by a TL edit it. Thoughts?
>
>
> [0] Participants included myself, sandalle, Kinetix, swoolley, afrayedknot,
> BearPerson, and ruskie. The log is attached.



--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru

Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962 69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page