sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance
- From: "Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:20:26 +0200
Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote :
>
> 1. We should continue to maintain a wiki for developing documentations,
> specifications, policies, etc; basically, the wiki will be the
> developer-facing web place to propose things and work on them til
> they're complete.
>
Agreed... Not all of use are webdesigners/content editors. I write stuff
so that it's documented... I don't bother with the final look much...
> 2. When things on the wiki are complete, they should get moved to the
> Drupal
> site. The Drupal site will be the public-facing site, with only final
> content. It will combine this content with forums, blogs, and other
> user-facing functions that Drupal integrates well.
>
Sounds great... and will finnaly give the tome team some work to do...
> 3. It should be the individual Team Leads' responsibility to make sure
> things in their areas of the wiki that are complete get moved to the
> Drupal site in a timely manner. The Tome team and the Project
> Lead/Asst. Project Lead will be available to help with this, but it
> will be the TL's job to make sure it gets done. Drupal will remain
> editable only by those who have edit permissions, which includes the
> Tome team, the Leads, and their designees.
>
No objection here...
> How do the rest of you who have an opinion feel about this? A question yet
> to answer would be who would have either read or write access to the wiki.
>
I say all devels have rw; also have the ability to assign anonymously editable
pages as well. And imho all have read access(we do support and openly
reviewable
by anyone development proccess).
> We would want to make it useful for what it's intended for without creating
> a scenario where it just takes over the role of the Drupal site for
> content, because that just makes the Tome team's job harder. The most
> draconian approach would be to only allow registered developers to read and
> write the dev wiki. A more open approach would be to let anyone read it
> and any registered user approved by a TL edit it. Thoughts?
>
>
> [0] Participants included myself, sandalle, Kinetix, swoolley, afrayedknot,
> BearPerson, and ruskie. The log is attached.
--
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962 69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jason Flatt, 10/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Jason Flatt, 10/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Jason Flatt, 10/09/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/21/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Mathieu L., 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Mathieu L., 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Eric Sandall, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Eric Sandall, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Eric Sandall, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jason Flatt, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Andrew, 10/24/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Andrew, 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Questions About Drupal Functionality and Acceptance,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 10/24/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.