sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:59:37 -0700
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:45:40PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> On Sep 27, Jason Flatt [jflatt AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 11:19 am, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:43:23AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
> > > > On Sep 27, Seth Alan Woolley [seth AT positivism.org] wrote:
> > > > > This is a very useful feature, I think, but if it's not affecting
> > > > > ordering and is more of a suggestion, I'm not sure it should be
> > > > > considered a dependency.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps it should be called a symbiont and be put in a SYMBIONTS
> > > > > file,
> > > > >
> > > > > Or friend or amicus/amici or mutual_with or simply uses or
> > > > > related_to,
> > > >
> > > > How about just 'suggest espgs', possibly in a SUGGESTED file.
> > >
> > > Works for me. I was being half facetious when I "suggested" symbionts.
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Seth
> >
> > I kind of liked your idea of a single file to handle all that stuff. Of
> > course I'm not submitting any patches, so I'm not sure how far my opinion
> > will carry. :)
>
> Single file is probably better, I agree.
I just wanted one or the other. Either we have one file that handles
the dependency processing gestalt, or we have a different file for each
concept. One file saves space on disk, which is probably the most
important difference between the two philosophies pragmatically.
Seth
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Key id FDCEE733 = 5302 B414 64C4 6112 3454 E082 99F0 69DC FDCE E733
Attachment:
pgpsv1y8G68Jr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . ., Jason Flatt, 09/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .,
Jason Flatt, 09/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .,
Andrew, 09/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Jason Flatt, 09/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 09/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Seth Alan Woolley, 09/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Jason Flatt, 09/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 09/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Seth Alan Woolley, 09/28/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Andrew, 09/28/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 09/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . .,
Jason Flatt, 09/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Mads Laursen, 09/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Seth Alan Woolley, 09/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Andrew, 09/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Seth Alan Woolley, 09/29/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .,
Andrew, 09/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cups and Ghostscript . . .,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Andrew, 09/29/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] "suggested_depends" . . ., Seth Alan Woolley, 09/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.