sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:41:30 -0600
On Feb 22, Andrew [afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com] wrote:
> The other day it came up on irc that if you did a cast -r (reconfigure)
> but not -c (always compile) if the spell was resurrectable the options
> you gave with -r are meaningless because the spell gets resurrect. So
> I'd like to have -r imply -c.
>
> Otherwise its just confusing to reconfigure something and then have the
> changes be ignored because the spell wont be compiled, also the changes
> you select are replaced by the ones from the resurrect tarball.
>
> Objections? Comments? Questions?
IMO that's the only obvious way for it to work. ;-)
Seriously, for how many spells does it make sense to reconfigure them
without rebuilding them to apply the changes?
Attachment:
pgpsM3GfMv7Xu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r,
Andrew, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Terry Ross, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Flavien Bridault, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Karsten Behrmann, 02/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.