sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:25:03 -0800
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> The other day it came up on irc that if you did a cast -r (reconfigure)
> but not -c (always compile) if the spell was resurrectable the options
> you gave with -r are meaningless because the spell gets resurrect. So
> I'd like to have -r imply -c.
>
> Otherwise its just confusing to reconfigure something and then have the
> changes be ignored because the spell wont be compiled, also the changes
> you select are replaced by the ones from the resurrect tarball.
>
> Objections? Comments? Questions?
Makes sense to me, thanks. :)
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r,
Andrew, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Terry Ross, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Jeremy Blosser, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Flavien Bridault, 02/23/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] cast, -c and -r, Karsten Behrmann, 02/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.