sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:50:53 +0100
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 10:44:09AM +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Le Samedi 19 Février 2005 08:23, Ladislav Hagara a écrit :
> > Howdy all,
> >
> > just found out, after sorcery system-update, that my box is totally
> > broken. It is related to new glibc integrated yesterday to test
> > grimoire. Just trying to rescue it as described at
> > https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2005-January/008929.html
> > I do not think it will be only my problem.
> I had the problem yesterday, doing a cast --queue. The issue has been glibc
> casted twice, because of a TRIGGER in glibc-kernel-headers. Well and I
> don't
> know why, but glibc failed to cast the second time. I was able to reproduce
> it later [0].
I'm really sorry about that trigger, those of us on devel have been so
long without the glibc-kernel-headers spell that we all forgot to remove
it.
All I can say about that failure so far is that the compile line in the
bug is definitely missing some includes, but I don't know why yet.
> So if you have the same problem than me, you will need to untar a previous
> working glibc in /var/cache/sorcery, and also, maybe util-linux since it is
> triggered by glibc. After that you need to do a ldconfig. But if you have
> the
> same problem as me, you can not chroot. However you can do a
>
> ldconfig -r myroot/
>
> Or, as swoolley suggested, you can also boot with the following options
> init=/sbin/ldconfig, that should work too.
>
> I hope that can help you.
>
> [0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8277
> --
> Flavien Bridault
> Source Mage GNU/Linux - Disk Guru
>
> IRC : vlaaad
> Jabber : vlaaad AT amessage.be
>
> http://www.sourcemage.org
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Ladislav Hagara, 02/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Bas van Gils, 02/19/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Flavien Bridault, 02/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Ladislav Hagara, 02/19/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/19/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/20/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Seth Alan Woolley, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Andrew, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Seth Alan Woolley, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/22/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, Andrew, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/22/2005
- RE: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire, George J. Sherwood, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Eric Sandall, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Seth Alan Woolley, 02/22/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc - test grimoire,
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.