sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic]
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:02:36 +0100
Eric Sandall a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
Okay, just for clarification,
would benoit and me be skipping version numbers again (so that there is
only one test4) or would there be a ng-test3 and a -test3?
I'd be ready to move the stuff around on the mirror, and anyone with
admins could add/rename the bugzilla stuff.
So Far,
Karsten
You'd be separate branches and so you use your own numbers with the
ng-test or -test naming.
Karsten reminded me on IRC that I forgot to put in a kernel version.
;) I'd say it should go before <nptl|non-nptl>, so
-<kernel-version>-<nptl|non-nptl>:
e.g. smgl-0.9.3-x86-2.6-nptl-test3.bz2 or
smgl-0.9.3-ppc-2.6-non-nptl-ng-test2.bz2.
-sandalle
I posted your mail on the wiki:
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=ISO+numbering+scheme
Feel free to edit is something is wrong.
Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO guru
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Andrew, 02/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)], Eric Sandall, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)], Andrew, 02/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/02/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Andrew, 02/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.