sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)]
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)]
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:34:39 -0800
Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> p4 group -o sorcery_proj2
> <snip>
> Users:
> andrew_stitt
> benoit_papillault
> eric_sandall
> laurent_wandrebeck
> paul_mahon
>
> Either this was done already or someone did it before i woke up and checked.
> Although I would prefer if we could stick with our plan and the priorities
> layed out by our project leader (of which, bi-arch appears to be absent).
Correct, I had a typo and fixed it this morning.
As for bi-arch; that is low-priority (IMO as well as the majority's opinion)
as
we have bigger fish to fry: such as the 40+ bugs filed against the ISO[0] that
need to be fixed for 1.0.
-sandalle
[0]
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Install&component=Installer&component=ISO&component=Unknown&version=0.9.3&version=0.9.4&version=0.9.4-test2&version=0.9.4-test3&version=pre-1.0&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Andrew, 02/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)], Eric Sandall, 02/01/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/01/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)], Andrew, 02/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic],
Benoit PAPILLAULT, 02/02/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 02/02/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic (not really)],
Andrew, 02/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.