Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>]

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:11:24PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
> Andrew a ?crit :
> >p4 group -o sorcery_proj2
> ><snip>
> >Users:
> >        andrew_stitt
> >        benoit_papillault
> >        eric_sandall
> >        laurent_wandrebeck
> >        paul_mahon
> >
> >Either this was done already or someone did it before i woke up and 
> >checked.
> >Although I would prefer if we could stick with our plan and the priorities
> >layed out by our project leader (of which, bi-arch appears to be absent).
> >
> >-Andrew
> 
> Yes. Eric did it (and send me a private email to let me know). I thought 
> it would be good to update (in fact, most of my stuff is already in 
> proj2) p4 with the source code on my hard drive, before I got hit by a 
> truck.
> 
> "sorcery bi-arch" has been listed as a low priority item, but is there. 
> So, if you are trying to tell me that I understand it wrong, maybe we 
> should put some wiki page so that anyone can refer to it. (Eric, can you 
> do it and publish the link here?).
> 

Thank you for getting your code to our repository before the truck hits you.

I just wanted to make sure we all know and agree on what the priorities
are, obviously theres no way for anyone discern the difference between
you wanting access to actively work on bi-arch or access to commit
your existing work from the communication I saw in #sourcemage-cauldron
and your previous email. Sorry for the confusion.

-Andrew

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt                           | astitt at sourcemage.org    |
|irc: afrayedknot                          | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus    | acedit at armory.com        |
|Sorcery Team Lead                         | ftp://t.armory.com/         |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpy_T4Ix8rUd.pgp
Description: PGP signature