sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:02:28 -0800
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:52:38PM -0500, Paul Mahon wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible for a spell to change the default
> answers to the init.d questions somehow. That would help with init
> scripts which /always/ should be installed and enabled... do we have any
> of those?
IMO if an init.d script should always be installed it shouldnt be in
the place where sorcery looks for scripts that it will ask the user about
installing...
>
>
> Jeremy said, "Just updated init.d from test."
test sorcery? test grimoire? Which one? They are different, both should
be specified, besides we havent changed the init.d code in test sorcery.
> Andrew said, "... what sorcery version?" And, "...if you cant stand to
> have your box break from time to time, use test or stable..."
-
[SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Andrew, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Paul Mahon, 12/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Andrew, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Andrew, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Eric Schabell, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Seth Alan Woolley, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Eric Sandall, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Eric Schabell, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Seth Alan Woolley, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Eric Sandall, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Andrew, 12/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad, Jeremy Kolb, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Paul Mahon, 12/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init.d defaults are evil and bad,
Andrew, 12/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.