Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] please be more careful with spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] please be more careful with spells
  • Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:39:02 -0800

Quoting Bas van Gils <Bas.vanGils AT cs.ru.nl>:
<snip>
> I agree that spells should be *tested* and/or *checked*. From the top of my
> head, I thought that the procedure was:
> - playground => devel grimoire, may contain spells that don't build / break
> stuff
> - if it builds => move into test
> - if it runs stable for a (long) while => move to stable
>
> Right?

Correct. The package did build, but it wasn't tested with all combinations of
its options (it was only tested without the patch, not with it) that caused
the
problem.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page