sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site)
- From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site)
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:59:53 +0200
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:10:45AM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:45:59AM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:09:42AM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:56:55AM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > > > Howdy all,
> > > >
> > > > Was just wondering when and why we no longer have extra mirrors for
> > > > SORCERY (/etc/sorcery/mirrors/SORCERY)? Having only one is not a good
> > > > idea if you ask me...
> > > >
> > > > erics
> > >
> > > seems like a bad idea to me having multiple mirrors and hoping they all
> > > are actually synced up with the right bits all the time...especially
> > > when i dont have access to them.
> > >
> > We do it with grimoires, what makes sorcery so special that we have to
> > rely on one point of failure?
>
> Well if you really want to have this discussion...the main reasons would
> be security, and control. You have made the assumption that a single point
> of failure is a bad thing, whereas on the flip side there could be a
> number of sorcery mirrors and if just one of the gets the wrong bits
> for some reason we're going to run into some potentially disastrous
<big snip>
Outside the longwinded reply... the tarball on download is pulled from
a location provided by autogenerating scripts on perforce server, same
as grimoire tarballs.
The only sites that should be supported as mirrors are ones that pull
from these locations. That is what we do with grimoires, why not keep
the mirroring of sorcery alive for those that provide it from the same
location as download.
Simple service, simple solution, non-detrimental to "your sorcery" and
quite handy as fallback. At the very least you can trust SMGL guru's and
team leads, can't you?
erics
Attachment:
pgpiXrkWDGHyd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site), Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Bas van Gils, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site), Andrew, 10/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Eric Schabell, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mirrors removed from SORCERY (only smgl central site),
Andrew, 10/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.