Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Unet <unet.42 AT free.fr>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0
  • Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:56:38 +0200


> The last LSB i looked at had a single, and rather poorly written clause
> about package management. It seemed to allude to the fact that you had
> to use rpm although it was written ambiguously enough that you /could/
> interprit it to mean that package managers with equivalent functionality
> (sorcery) were acceptable as well. I haven't read the new one so I dont
> know if they've addressed that or not.

IIRC LSB only specifies that you should provide a way to install rpms.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page