sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Unet <unet.42 AT free.fr>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:56:38 +0200
> The last LSB i looked at had a single, and rather poorly written clause
> about package management. It seemed to allude to the fact that you had
> to use rpm although it was written ambiguously enough that you /could/
> interprit it to mean that package managers with equivalent functionality
> (sorcery) were acceptable as well. I haven't read the new one so I dont
> know if they've addressed that or not.
IIRC LSB only specifies that you should provide a way to install rpms.
-
[SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
evraire, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Andrew, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Unet, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Andrew, 09/14/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0, Seth Alan Woolley, 09/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Andrew, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Unet, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Andrew, 09/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Linux Standard Base v2.0,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.