Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
  • Cc: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:30:44 -0500

Yes pretty much.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 16:42 -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> Isn't this similar to djb's stuff?
>
> Where do we put his stuff?
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:35:25PM -0500, Robin Cook wrote:
> > From reading the license since they restrict redistribution of modified
> > source and documentation that makes it non-FSF compliant.
> >
> > CuZnDragon
> > Robin Cook
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 17:50 +0000, Mathieu L wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I've just finished a spell (for the moment it's in dev grimoire) and I'd
> > > lke your opinion about 2 points.
> > > To start, the spellname is unfortunately root simply because the devs
> > > decided to name their program this way. Afrayedknot said it shouldn't be
> > > any problem for sorcery but if someone see a good reason I could still
> > > change the spellname to smthg like "cern_root" (it's made by cern
> > > physicists).
> > > The second point is about the licence
> > > (http://root.cern.ch/root/License.html): it is not listed our usual free
> > > licences and I think alley_cat and afrayedknot told me it's not fsf
> > > compliant but I wanted to be sure; so shall I put it in z-rejected or
> > > not?
> > >
> > > To Afrayedknot (or any sorcery dev):
> > > at first I had these error messages when cast was trying to interpret my
> > > architectures file, probably because I had put the dialog command
> > > in PRE_BUILD instead of in CONFIGURE. Then I corrected everything and
> > > the spell was casting fine but I still had these error messages and it
> > > couldn't be because of the spell because the lines cast was trying to
> > > interpret didn't even exist anymore (those were lines in my
> > > old architectures file that I removed after we discussed about which
> > > arch we really support.)
> > > I ran cleanse and it had no effect but when I removed
> > > /etc/sorcery/local/depends/root and same_path/root.p I never had these
> > > messages again.
> > > Just telling you that in case it could be a glitch in sorcery.
> > >
> > > /Mathieu.
> > > - ------------------------------------------------
> > > We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
> > > Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
> > > - ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iD8DBQFA+AuSkMJFIMI9DicRAtM/AKDBZQlkO/I6K9GKuDub1uvp1IgqGACggFR+
> > > oi1mKgqXUCamNxsH3lxWauo=
> > > =Sn/2
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page