Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
  • To: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • Cc: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:42:38 -0700

Isn't this similar to djb's stuff?

Where do we put his stuff?

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:35:25PM -0500, Robin Cook wrote:
> From reading the license since they restrict redistribution of modified
> source and documentation that makes it non-FSF compliant.
>
> CuZnDragon
> Robin Cook
>
> On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 17:50 +0000, Mathieu L wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi all,
> > I've just finished a spell (for the moment it's in dev grimoire) and I'd
> > lke your opinion about 2 points.
> > To start, the spellname is unfortunately root simply because the devs
> > decided to name their program this way. Afrayedknot said it shouldn't be
> > any problem for sorcery but if someone see a good reason I could still
> > change the spellname to smthg like "cern_root" (it's made by cern
> > physicists).
> > The second point is about the licence
> > (http://root.cern.ch/root/License.html): it is not listed our usual free
> > licences and I think alley_cat and afrayedknot told me it's not fsf
> > compliant but I wanted to be sure; so shall I put it in z-rejected or
> > not?
> >
> > To Afrayedknot (or any sorcery dev):
> > at first I had these error messages when cast was trying to interpret my
> > architectures file, probably because I had put the dialog command
> > in PRE_BUILD instead of in CONFIGURE. Then I corrected everything and
> > the spell was casting fine but I still had these error messages and it
> > couldn't be because of the spell because the lines cast was trying to
> > interpret didn't even exist anymore (those were lines in my
> > old architectures file that I removed after we discussed about which
> > arch we really support.)
> > I ran cleanse and it had no effect but when I removed
> > /etc/sorcery/local/depends/root and same_path/root.p I never had these
> > messages again.
> > Just telling you that in case it could be a glitch in sorcery.
> >
> > /Mathieu.
> > - ------------------------------------------------
> > We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
> > Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
> > - ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFA+AuSkMJFIMI9DicRAtM/AKDBZQlkO/I6K9GKuDub1uvp1IgqGACggFR+
> > oi1mKgqXUCamNxsH3lxWauo=
> > =Sn/2
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss


--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgptgypjecqrI.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page