sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:08:55 -0700
I vote for naming the spell cern_root. Im not the license expert so
I've made no discernable motion in either direction for where the spell
should go.
In regards to the sorcery issue you were seeing. Cleanse does nothing
with /etc/sorcery/local/depends/ files.
My guess as to what happened is that you were trying to stuff some
rather interesting things into persistent variables somehow and cast got
confused. Having not really seen your messed up root/root.p files in action
and not having a clear idea what your spell was doing i cant really help
you too much there, but if the problem went away after cleaning up those
(probably corrupted) files then I would venture to guess that theres
nothing sorcery was doing wrong.
The reason why I was so animated about not putting configuration questions
in PRE_BUILD is that my philosophy is that all interaction should occur
before the "do you want to cast these spells?" question. After that
point the user should be able to walk away, granted that may not always
be the case, but we should strive to make it that way.
-Andrew
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:50:20PM +0000, Mathieu L wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
> I've just finished a spell (for the moment it's in dev grimoire) and I'd
> lke your opinion about 2 points.
> To start, the spellname is unfortunately root simply because the devs
> decided to name their program this way. Afrayedknot said it shouldn't be
> any problem for sorcery but if someone see a good reason I could still
> change the spellname to smthg like "cern_root" (it's made by cern
> physicists).
> The second point is about the licence
> (http://root.cern.ch/root/License.html): it is not listed our usual free
> licences and I think alley_cat and afrayedknot told me it's not fsf
> compliant but I wanted to be sure; so shall I put it in z-rejected or
> not?
>
> To Afrayedknot (or any sorcery dev):
> at first I had these error messages when cast was trying to interpret my
> architectures file, probably because I had put the dialog command
> in PRE_BUILD instead of in CONFIGURE. Then I corrected everything and
> the spell was casting fine but I still had these error messages and it
> couldn't be because of the spell because the lines cast was trying to
> interpret didn't even exist anymore (those were lines in my
> old architectures file that I removed after we discussed about which
> arch we really support.)
> I ran cleanse and it had no effect but when I removed
> /etc/sorcery/local/depends/root and same_path/root.p I never had these
> messages again.
> Just telling you that in case it could be a glitch in sorcery.
>
> /Mathieu.
> - ------------------------------------------------
> We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant.
> Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated.
> - ------------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA+AuSkMJFIMI9DicRAtM/AKDBZQlkO/I6K9GKuDub1uvp1IgqGACggFR+
> oi1mKgqXUCamNxsH3lxWauo=
> =Sn/2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> ______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
>
>
> Powered by Outblaze
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
__________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt at sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot at t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | |
|Sorcery Team Lead, Porting Team Lead | |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl | ftp://t.armory.com |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[SM-Discuss] root spell,
Mathieu L, 07/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell, Andrew, 07/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell,
Robin Cook, 07/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell,
Seth Alan Woolley, 07/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell, Robin Cook, 07/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] root spell,
Seth Alan Woolley, 07/16/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.