sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- From: Steven Pinkham <steve.pinkham AT comcast.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 07:21:44 -0400
* Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> [2004-04-08 21:50]:
> I just let them cast in the order that they were in the `sorcery queue &&
> cast
> --queue` (I don't recall their order). As for /etc/fstab and your boot
> loader
> (LILO or GRUB), just make sure that they use the dev/udev style[0] and not
> the
> devfs[1] style naming scheme and you'll be set. You may also want to check
> /etc/inittab as well, but I only had to modify /etc/fstab (as I use GRUB
> and it
> has its own device naming[2]).
>
> -sandalle
>
> [0] /dev/hda1
> [1] /dev/discs/disc0/part1
> [2] (hd0,1)
I have a line in my lilo.conf file that says:
append="devfs=mount"
I assume this now needs to be commented out, no matter what choice I
make for init.d?
--
| Steven E. Pinkham |
| Consultant, Maven Security Consulting |
| steve.pinkham AT comcast.net |
| GPG public key ID 4B4F66B3 |
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Craig Van Tassle, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Robin Cook, 04/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Steven Pinkham, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Robin Cook, 04/09/2004
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Treeve Jelbert, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bas van Gils, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.