sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:34:37 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric,
Thanx!
Cool! I'll do it on my system next week...well maybe after I do my taxes.
Bearcat
On Thursday 08 April 2004 19:53 in an email titled "Re: [SM-Discuss] New
udev,
simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test" Eric Sandall wrote:
>Quoting "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>:
>> Eric,
>>
>> I assumed that this has all been discussed b4 in a mail that came in weeks
>> ago
>> when i was asleep, but:
>>
>> 1: What changes do i need to make to fstab and lilo (other files?)
>> 2: Wat order do i need to cast these spells in? Is it save to let it
>> happen with a normal 'sorcery system-update' or 'sorcery queue' + 'cast
>> --queue'?
>>
>> You can just tell me to bugger off and go read some Wiki page..but then
>> you'd
>>
>> sound like the Mplayer people...
>
>I just let them cast in the order that they were in the `sorcery queue &&
> cast --queue` (I don't recall their order). As for /etc/fstab and your boot
> loader (LILO or GRUB), just make sure that they use the dev/udev style[0]
> and not the devfs[1] style naming scheme and you'll be set. You may also
> want to check /etc/inittab as well, but I only had to modify /etc/fstab (as
> I use GRUB and it has its own device naming[2]).
>
>-sandalle
>
>[0] /dev/hda1
>[1] /dev/discs/disc0/part1
>[2] (hd0,1)
- --
Bearcat M. Sandor
Owner
The Dragon's Edge
Voice: 406.677.DRGN (3746)
Bearcat AT TheDragonsEdge.com
ICQ: 6628727
MSN: bearcatsandor AT hotmail.com
Yahoo: bearcatsandor
AIM: bearcatmsandor
Jabber: bearcatsandor AT jabber.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFAdhncya+RPo9ly58RAstsAJjalAOdCQ0ZrETmc54l5K/6xTZpAJ43zRG8
YXAgkiNuGhR1gdUZyjcFIg==
=yRqm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Hamish Greig, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Craig Van Tassle, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Robin Cook, 04/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Steven Pinkham, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.