sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- From: Bas van Gils <Bas.vanGils AT cs.kun.nl>
- To: SMGL-Discuss List <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:21 +0200
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:52:13PM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Just so you know I tried out converting to udev on /dev with the new spells
> in
> test and it went fine (except for my own stupidity in converting the devfs
> LVM
> names to dev LVM names /and/ trying out a new kernel at the same time. ;)).
It's good to hear that the new udev works just fine now. Having switched from
static /dev to devfs a while ago I followed the discussion on udev with some
interest. I'm not entirely sure why I would want to swtich from devfs to udev,
though, except for the fact that devfs seems to be obsolete in 2.6.x kernels.
So, I was wondering:
- why would I want to switch?
- will there be a document similar to "HOWTO-devfsd setup" on our wiki to
guide "simple users like me" through the process? For example, I would be
interested to know how to convert some of the rules in my devfsd.conf to
udev.
Thanks for your replies,
Bas
--
drs. Bas van Gils <Bas.vanGils AT cs.kun.nl> | /(bb|[^b]{2})/
http://www.cs.kun.nl/~basvg | that's the question
PGP = 3805 664A F24E 90D5 6A77 C624 E13D 0440 2768 A493 |
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Eric Sandall, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Robin Cook, 04/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Steven Pinkham, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Hamish Greig, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Robin Cook, 04/09/2004
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Treeve Jelbert, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bas van Gils, 04/09/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test, Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] New udev, simpleinit-msb, and init.d spells in test,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 04/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.