sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:09:18 +0100
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:21:09AM +0100, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > > > I don't see a problem with creating a plugins section, such as
> > > > x11-pluggins (as video-plugins, etc.). Anyone else?
> >
> > > See https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-users/2004-March/000629.html
> >
> > Should this be made an official SMGL grimoire, or should it just be a
> > section?
>
> I vote for section. No next grimoire.
> And better, if it is possible, only one gkrellm spell with all its plugins
> and
> DIALOG interface to choose some of them.
The problem i see with having only one spell is we need some way to make
sure only newly chosen plugins get compiled, i don't want to recompile
gkrellm + 20 plugins just to get one new plugin installed.
I think having seperate spells for the plugins is better, maybe with a
profile gkrellm-plugins that optional_depends on all of them.
I don't think these spells warrant creating a whole new grimoire, a new
section gkrellm would be nice though.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Eric Sandall, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Robert Helgesson, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Jason Flatt, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/26/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells, Jason Flatt, 03/26/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells, Eric Sandall, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Eric Schabell, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/26/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells, Jason Flatt, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Jason Flatt, 03/25/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells, Ricardo Izquierdo, 03/26/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Spell-Submit] new spells,
Robert Helgesson, 03/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.