sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:38:08 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:13, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:07:45PM +1100, Hamish Greig wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:34, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:47:27PM +0800, Craig Dyke wrote:
> > > > Hopefully just a quickie.
> > > >
> > > > I have adopted the udev format and am quite impressed so far :)
> > > >
> > > > My query is, does udev still rely on devfs being built into kernel?
> > > >
> > > > Scenario is that I got udev up and running using suggested steps from
> > > > earlier emails.
> > > > Once all was working well, I configured a second kernel where I
> > > > removed devfs and this
> > > > does not load.
> > > >
> > > > Is this correct behaviour?
> > >
> > > udev definitely doesn't need devfs in the kernel. What fails when
> > > loading the new kernel, does it fail to mount the root device? If
> > > that's the case then you'll want to check if your lilo.conf/grub.conf
> > > uses devfs names for the root= kernel parameter. A devfs kernel can
> > > handle both styles of device names for that parameter, a kernel without
> > > devfs needs a classic device name (e.g. /dev/hda2).
> >
> > likely no static /dev entries, ISO's from 0.7.X to 0.9.1 had no /dev
>
> The spells i did take care of that by creating a static /dev if it can't
> find some needed static /dev files (console, null).
I didn't think he used them. I think he just used the grimoire spells
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYuDI8fSufZR6424RAroOAJ4wGQqxjxwf1namCqeEKy3qJRFrTACffagG
sDRO219x+zcOUm3rDS+CvFk=
=GZnI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Craig Dyke, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Hamish Greig, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Craig Dyke, 03/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Jason Flatt, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Craig Dyke, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
ruskie, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
ruskie, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Craig Dyke, 03/28/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.