sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

[SM-Discuss] udev and devfs

From: "Craig Dyke" <grail AT westnet.com.au>
To: "discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:47:27 +0800

Hopefully just a quickie.

I have adopted the udev format and am quite impressed so far :)

My query is, does udev still rely on devfs being built into kernel?

Scenario is that I got udev up and running using suggested steps from
earlier emails.
Once all was working well, I configured a second kernel where I removed
devfs and this
does not load.

Is this correct behaviour?

Craig

[SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/23/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/24/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/25/2004
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Hamish Greig, 03/25/2004
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/27/2004
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/27/2004
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/28/2004
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Jason Flatt, 03/28/2004
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, Craig Dyke, 03/28/2004
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] udev and devfs, ruskie, 03/28/2004