sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:47:26 -0600
I'm with David. I turn it so I can see it as thing compile so I can note
if I see something strange and go back to look at it later.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:39 -0600, David Kowis wrote:
> But I like to watch things compile. It makes me feel better. Like I'm not
> wasting several hours compiling software instead of doing something with it.
> I don't think it's that bad.
> It would be cool in a windowed type environment, so that you can see where
> you are in the list of steps, the stuff being downloaded, and the
> compilation messages. I don't suppose there's any way to do that without
> using a gui...
> Oh well, just the deranged ravings of a tired soul.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Eric Sandall
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:40 PM
> To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default
>
>
> Quoting Vladimír Marek <vlmarek AT volny.cz>:
> > Yes, generally this is a nice idea. Two things against:
> > a) time
> > cast mozilla takes it's time, and people may start to be nervous after
> > tree hours. They can always look at `top`, but I'd rather that not be the
> "fix".
>
> Perhaps some method of letting the user know that cast is doing something? A
> spinner, perhaps?
>
> > b) in case of error
> > it's nice to see what actually failed
>
> `gaze compile <spell>` should show the latest log (whether it was successful
> or
> not).
>
> > ad a)
> > Isn't there some way to attach to running cast (gaze voyeur or
> > something ?) which would display full log on request ?
>
> There is `gaze voyeur` (run as root) which will view the cast as it happens.
>
> > ad b) I haven't seen any errors (not counting my experiments with spell
> > system) so far, and in the rare case when shit happens, we could use the
> > attach method as in a), right ?
>
> Yep.
>
> -sandalle
>
> --
> PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
> http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@
> o?
> K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
> tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Vladimír Marek, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
David Kowis, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Thomas Matysik, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, Jason Flatt, 03/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, Paul, 03/17/2004
- RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, David Kowis, 03/17/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Robin Cook, 03/17/2004
- RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Thomas Matysik, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Eric Schabell, 03/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default, Jason Flatt, 03/18/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
David Kowis, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Eric Sandall, 03/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery VOYEUR default,
Vladimír Marek, 03/17/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.