Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] xconfig with linux-2.6.x

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xconfig with linux-2.6.x
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 03:03:21 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hamish,

I've been wrestilng with the qtdir problem for the last 4 days. Moving the QT
installation to a more standard spot would be welcome, asap.

Thanx,

Bearcat

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 02:51 in an email titled "Re: [SM-Discuss]
xconfig with linux-2.6.x" Hamish Greig wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:41, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:37:45AM +0100, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > has any tried using xconfig for linux-2.6.x?
>> >
>> >
>> > I get the following error
>> >
>> > root@Sourcemage:/usr/src/linux# make xconfig
>> > make[1]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
>> > *
>> > * Unable to find the QT installation. Please make sure that the
>> > * QT development package is correctly installed and the QTDIR
>> > * environment variable is set to the correct location.
>> > *
>> > make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_qtcheck] Error 1
>> >
>> > - ---
>> > root@Sourcemage:~# echo $QTDIR
>> > /usr
>> >
>> >
>> > '$make gconfig ' works
>>
>> I've tried it some time ago just to see how it looks, no luck. I have no
>> idea why it's failing, all the tests i've seen in the Makefile should be
>> working :/
>
>our setup for qtdir is slightly non-standard I think, the standard is to
> have all of qt (libs, bins and includes) under the general path $QTDIR.
>If you manually edit the correct files i the kernel scripts dir (can't
>remember was a few months ago) it will work for you.
>My intention was to change our qt spell with the next major version update,
> to both use the /etc/profile.d/* format and install to a uniform prefix,
> but I never filed a bug so no-one else knew of my intentions or my
> reasoning, so it wasn't done with the last update.
>Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKf31ya+RPo9ly58RAiQMAJ909SqX/FFBZmXrExQb91iJFRce8ACeNK4b
YzP9PcUmjY4MC+V4SO/xpcc=
=XRhX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page