sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: bashdoc (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic)
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: bashdoc (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic)
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:50:38 -0600 (CST)
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Paul wrote:
> The desired way of documenting is using bashdoc, it tries to look like
> javadoc. However, many of the scripts have not been converted yet. If
> you're looking to familiarise yourself, converting a couple (and
> documenting the undocumented functions) would probably help your
> understanding. The sorcery docs on my site are a litle out of date, but
> anyone can generate their own fairly quickly.
>
> http://dufflebunk.homeip.net/~dufflebunk/sorcerer/docs/
>
Cool thanks. A quick search yielded this from sm-discuss in september
(which I must have slept through).
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss/2003-September/004226.html
Once I start having a life of my own again, I'll start digging into
sorcery.
-casey
-
[SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Jaanus Heeringson, 02/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic, Paul, 02/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Casey Harkins, 02/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Casey Harkins, 02/03/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic, Andrew, 02/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Hamish Greig, 02/03/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Casey Harkins, 02/04/2004
-
bashdoc (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic),
Paul, 02/04/2004
- Re: bashdoc (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic), Casey Harkins, 02/04/2004
-
bashdoc (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic),
Paul, 02/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Casey Harkins, 02/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Functional "theme" instead of cosmetic,
Casey Harkins, 02/03/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.