sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
- From: "Dufflebunk" <dufflebunk AT go-nix.ca>
- To: "Casey Harkins" <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>, "Dufflebunk" <dufflebunk AT go-nix.ca>
- Cc: Source Mage Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 22:59:07 -0400
Yes, something like that would have to be done. It would also have to
include config_cache info too, and any other files like the kernel config
file linux produces or hosts.def that xfree produces.
As for the depends/dispel thing, it's a bug and should be fixed, but itsn't
a high priority right now. In fact some people like it the way it is for
some odd reason ;)
--------- Original Message --------
From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Dufflebunk wrote:
<snip>
> > In cast, after the dependencies are checked, a check for the cached
tarball
> > is made. If this exists, the spell will be resurected, UNLESS -r or
-c are
> > specified (or a couple of other cases that force those switches).
> >
> > So if you have a global cache, cast will assume that the dependancies
you
> > chose are those for the tarball in the cache. You are correct that
the
> > depends info isn't stored in the cache. To do so would server little
purpose
> > (until people want to do what you want to do ;), would slow down the
> > dependancy checking substantialy, or would increase the complexity of
the
> > dependancy checking stuff a fair amount (something no one wants as
few
> > enough people as it is understand that section of code).
>
> Since cast is assuming that the dependencies are the same as the tarball
> in the cache, couldn't the cache just store its dependencies in the cache.
> This way resurrecting could restore those to the depends info. dispel
> would also need to be modified to remove the depends info from
> /var/state/sorcery/depends. As it sits right now, 'gaze depends' can have
> incorrect results if you've dispelled something that had dependencies.
>
> > I believe that just a week or two ago someone posted a simple util
for
> > giving a LAN http access to your (source) cache. Using that and a
slightly
> > modified sorcery you could try to grab the compiled cache from the
server
> > running that util. It should only be necessary to add a line or two
to cast.
>
> I saw that, pretty nifty actually!
>
> I've decided to stick with my local binary grimoire solution. If at some
> point I decide that I can trust the client machines to build their own
> packages, I can simply switch grimoires. The spell names remain the same,
> all dependency info should be intact. A simple 'scribe add stable; scribe
> remove mybingrim; sorcery rebuild' should turn it back into a standard
> SMGL source based installation.
>
> I appreciate everyone's input!
>
> -casey
<snip more trailing crap>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Casey Harkins, 08/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Dufflebunk, 08/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Jayce^, 08/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/06/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Dufflebunk, 08/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Casey Harkins, 08/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.