sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- Cc: Source Mage Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:50:58 -0500 (CDT)
I also think that adding the dependencies to the cache would be trivial.
I'm not suggesting that any check using these dependencies be made when
resurrecting, rather sorcery could continue to assume they are correct.
However, by doing this, the integrity of the /var/state/sorcery/depends
could be maintained. This of course assumes that dispel is patched to
remove the dependencies in the first place.
-casey
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Seth Woolley wrote:
> The proposed situation was with systems that were essentially binary
> identical. I see very little cause for concern barring configure caring
> about the output of /proc/cpuinfo, etc that would cause differing
> configure options. Indeed, even a cabal-run source system would fail to
> similar problems, though not as many, I believe. I think it's something
> that we should consider adding basic support for, minding the caveats.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Hamish Greig, 08/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Casey Harkins, 08/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Dufflebunk, 08/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/03/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Jayce^, 08/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/06/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Casey Harkins, 08/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Seth Woolley, 08/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal,
Dufflebunk, 08/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SourceMage Binary Grimoire Proposal, Dufflebunk, 08/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.