Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>]

Spencer Ogden said:
> No reason not to. I think it is pretty clear cut. The script expects
> /sbin/dhcpcd, we have /usr/sbin/dhcpcd. I'm not too familiar with the
> meaning of the directories. I'm not sure if dhcpcd is in the wrong place,
> but one of the two spells should probably be fixed, seeing as they don't
> currently work out of the box.
>
> Spencer

We should probably find out what LSB says.  I believe dhcpcd should be in
/sbin, that way you can have networking available with only one mount.

-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>From spencero AT mail.utexas.edu  Wed Apr 16 21:59:46 2003
Return-Path: <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
Delivered-To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb3-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.138])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 6894320097
        for <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:59:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 15066 invoked by uid 0); 17 Apr 2003 01:59:45 -0000
Received: from cs2417546-33.austin.rr.com (HELO 192.168.5.2)
        (spencero AT 24.175.46.33)
        by umbs-smtp-3 with SMTP; 17 Apr 2003 01:59:45 -0000
From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:59:43 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304162059.43976.spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files
X-BeenThere: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: spencero AT mail.utexas.edu
List-Id: Public SourceMage Discussion List <sm-discuss.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 01:59:46 -0000

Why the change of permissions in the files sorcery maintains? I had gotten 
used to doing searches and other gaze functions as a normal user, but now 
that doesn't work. If this is intentional, then I think gaze needs a 
password entry since it is annoying to `su` just to do a `gaze what`. 
Specifically I think it is the restricted read access on codex.index which 
is causing this.

Spencer
>From warlock AT cyberlok.org  Wed Apr 16 22:21:07 2003
Return-Path: <warlock AT cyberlok.org>
Delivered-To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from host31.ipowerweb.com (host31.ipowerweb.com [12.129.198.131])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328F82006D
        for <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
        Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ip68-0-170-145.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.0.170.145] helo=warl0k)
        by host31.ipowerweb.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
        id 195z1E-0002R8-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:20:56 -0700
Message-ID: <018201c30488$67121ed0$0c00a8c0@warl0k>
From: "Glenn Shannon" <warlock AT cyberlok.org>
To: <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>, <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <200304162059.43976.spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:23:58 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
        abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host31.ipowerweb.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.ibiblio.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - cyberlok.org
X-BeenThere: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public SourceMage Discussion List <sm-discuss.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss>,
        <mailto:sm-discuss-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:21:07 -0000

Interesting point.

I think that the gaze functionality should work as a normal user, but scribe
and sorcery should not.

Sorcery team?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Spencer Ogden" <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
To: <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files


> Why the change of permissions in the files sorcery maintains? I had gotten
> used to doing searches and other gaze functions as a normal user, but now
> that doesn't work. If this is intentional, then I think gaze needs a
> password entry since it is annoying to `su` just to do a `gaze what`.
> Specifically I think it is the restricted read access on codex.index which
> is causing this.
>
> Spencer
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>