sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Glenn Shannon <warlock AT cyberlok.org>
- Cc: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: spencero AT mail.utexas.edu
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:24:22 -0400 (EDT)
'cept for gaze prune. though i think that should be moved to sorcery.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Glenn Shannon wrote:
> Interesting point.
>
> I think that the gaze functionality should work as a normal user, but scribe
> and sorcery should not.
>
> Sorcery team?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Spencer Ogden" <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
> To: <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:59 PM
> Subject: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files
>
>
> > Why the change of permissions in the files sorcery maintains? I had gotten
> > used to doing searches and other gaze functions as a normal user, but now
> > that doesn't work. If this is intentional, then I think gaze needs a
> > password entry since it is annoying to `su` just to do a `gaze what`.
> > Specifically I think it is the restricted read access on codex.index which
> > is causing this.
> >
> > Spencer
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 04/16/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Permissions of sorcery files, Dufflebunk, 04/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.