sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc

From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
To: SM-Discuss <SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:46:25 -0500

Hi!

Is having this test partition/chroot/whatever better handled by user-mode linux in the 2.5 kernel? My understanding is that uml is made for two purposes: a) test completely separate and possible unstable setup of Linux without risking the stable one; b) run software that's not easily adjusted for chroot. Is that correct?

Sergey.

[SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Duane Macolm, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Dufflebunk, 12/10/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Duane Macolm, 12/10/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Dufflebunk, 12/10/2002
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Duane Macolm, 12/10/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Mads Laursen, 12/10/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Mads Laursen, 12/15/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, George Mochrie, 12/10/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Duane Macolm, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Jason Flatt, 12/11/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Spencer Ogden, 12/11/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Jason Flatt, 12/11/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Dufflebunk, 12/11/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Dufflebunk, 12/11/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Multiple SGML on one pc, Jason Flatt, 12/12/2002