sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: Tom Garland <tgarland AT email.com>
- Cc: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>, SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 17:47:39 -0500 (CDT)
The advantage I see to bugzilla is that it makes it very easy for people
to track the status of spells they submit, complete with an autogenerated
e-mail when it is closed. Once all the spells make it in as bugs, they
could be re-opened to handle version bumps. While I don't think this is
the best solution, it certainly will work better than the mailing list and
require less work than maintaining a separate list in the wiki.
I submitted a spell back on July 22 which finally was added today (thanks
Ryan and Eric). I used bugzilla originally, then submitted it twice to
spell-submit, but no one got to it until Ryan brought up that there are
new spells slipping through the cracks. Had I not filed a bug for the
spell, I'm convinced it would have been lost until I submitted to the list
yet again.
I think the ideal solution would be to create our own simple mysql+php
based spell management system, but until that's done I think the bugzilla
route gives us more feedback as to what is being done.
Just my 1.5 cents...
-casey
On 7 Sep 2002, Tom Garland wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 09:34, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > There is no need for a second bugzilla. We just need people to use the
> > first.
> I agree, I mis-read Bernardo's 'grimoire team bugzilla' and missed the
> bugzilla word. (see below), I also didn't follow up on his next
> statements either :( That road of using bugzilla was not my intention.
>
> I think the spell-submit is a good and consistant place for new spells.
> Also I am willing in the short term to manage a a wiki list for it with
> the goal in the furture to incorporate any submitted spells as a part of
> the grimoire/codex. This way we have documentation for all submitted
> spells that have not made it to the devel grimoire/codex yet.
>
> >
> > We could add a category for submitted spells if we chose. Or we could
> > find another way to handle them.
> >
> > There needs to be something. We can discuss it at the meeting
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> > On Saturday, September 7, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Tom Garland wrote:
> >
> > > Conversation between toga and Bernardo on Sept. 7, 2002.
> > >
> slash cut
> > > <Bernardo> ok... Then why not bugzilla? it is there, working.
> > > <toga> Could still use it too. I'm willing to check it everyday also.
> > > <Bernardo> I still think that a grimoire team bugzilla could be the
> ^^^^^^^^
> > > best
> > > starting point as the "spell depot". A user/spell writer could check
> > > and see
> > > what is happening with the spell he sent
> > > <toga> Bernardo: That's the goal, but can't do it in a day ;)
> > > <Bernardo> toga: I don't know, having never set up bugzilla myself.
> > > But
> > > what would cost us to have a second bugzilla running from a
> > > www.sourcemage.org link? How much time, and who could set it up?
> > >
> > >
> > > The Bernardo and toga team ;)
> > >
>
> Have Fun! - toga
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.,
Tom Garland, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.,
Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.,
Tom Garland, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work., Casey Harkins, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.,
Tom Garland, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Submitted Spells - trying to make it work.,
Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.