sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Jayce^ <jason AT infogenix.com>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:30:49 -0500
speaking of just doing rebuilds. what about those other processor optimizations. i thought they were going to be in sorcery last monday. (you know the athlon-tm, a few intel one's and some other one i can't remember).
Jeremy
Jayce^ wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/me begins whimpering at the thought of doing another rebuild on his laptop.
but I *just* finished the last one..
Jayce^
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 10:29 am, Viggo Holmsen wrote:
I believe we should wait.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
1) GCC 3.1.1 is planned for release on july 21 with bugfixes, but the
branch will be unmaintained after that.
I think we would be better off by skipping GCC 3.1.1.
2) GCC 3.2 is planned for release on july 23 and will be the actively
maintained branch. It will require a sorcery rebuild, since the C++ ABI
will be incompatible with 3.1.
3) I think we should migrate to GCC 3.2 as soon as possible in the devel
grimoire, and let it filter down.
Viggo
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 16:33, Dufflebunk wrote:
GCC 3.1 Does have the bug that causes some bad behaviour in Mozilla_______________________________________________
(non-moving cusor), and there are problems compiling kdemultimedia with
certain optimizations. I've heard that the first problem will be fixed
in GCC 3.1.1 (and there is a patch for 3.1 now) that will fix at least
the first problem.
I would suggest that GCC 3 not be moved to test until GCC 3.1.1
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 10:18, Tony Smith wrote:
OK, it's been in devel for a while now and I'm soliciting comments on
whether
(a) devel users think the GCC 3 migration is complete and ready for the
test branch
(b) whether test branch users are ready for GCC 3.
If I don't hear to the contrary I'll assume all is well and roll it out
in my next update.
Tony.
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9NZvboTgdT9hhlCIRAgM0AKCTAer0diswcZof5eZTZh8OwFOccQCdHzzI
nbWHevN46gWiZ/k54OAnMak=
=RFH5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Eric Sandall, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.