sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Viggo Holmsen <vholmsen AT online.no>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>, Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:29:51 +0200
I believe we should wait.
1) GCC 3.1.1 is planned for release on july 21 with bugfixes, but the branch
will be unmaintained after that.
I think we would be better off by skipping GCC 3.1.1.
2) GCC 3.2 is planned for release on july 23 and will be the actively
maintained branch. It will require a sorcery rebuild, since the C++ ABI will
be incompatible with 3.1.
3) I think we should migrate to GCC 3.2 as soon as possible in the devel
grimoire, and let it filter down.
Viggo
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 16:33, Dufflebunk wrote:
> GCC 3.1 Does have the bug that causes some bad behaviour in Mozilla
> (non-moving cusor), and there are problems compiling kdemultimedia with
> certain optimizations. I've heard that the first problem will be fixed
> in GCC 3.1.1 (and there is a patch for 3.1 now) that will fix at least
> the first problem.
> I would suggest that GCC 3 not be moved to test until GCC 3.1.1
>
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 10:18, Tony Smith wrote:
> > OK, it's been in devel for a while now and I'm soliciting comments on
> > whether
> >
> > (a) devel users think the GCC 3 migration is complete and ready for the
> > test branch
> > (b) whether test branch users are ready for GCC 3.
> >
> > If I don't hear to the contrary I'll assume all is well and roll it out
> > in my next update.
> >
> > Tony.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Eric Sandall, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.