sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jayce^ <jason AT infogenix.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:31:23 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/me begins whimpering at the thought of doing another rebuild on his laptop.
but I *just* finished the last one..
Jayce^
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 10:29 am, Viggo Holmsen wrote:
> I believe we should wait.
>
> 1) GCC 3.1.1 is planned for release on july 21 with bugfixes, but the
> branch will be unmaintained after that.
> I think we would be better off by skipping GCC 3.1.1.
>
> 2) GCC 3.2 is planned for release on july 23 and will be the actively
> maintained branch. It will require a sorcery rebuild, since the C++ ABI
> will be incompatible with 3.1.
>
> 3) I think we should migrate to GCC 3.2 as soon as possible in the devel
> grimoire, and let it filter down.
>
> Viggo
>
> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 16:33, Dufflebunk wrote:
> > GCC 3.1 Does have the bug that causes some bad behaviour in Mozilla
> > (non-moving cusor), and there are problems compiling kdemultimedia with
> > certain optimizations. I've heard that the first problem will be fixed
> > in GCC 3.1.1 (and there is a patch for 3.1 now) that will fix at least
> > the first problem.
> > I would suggest that GCC 3 not be moved to test until GCC 3.1.1
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 10:18, Tony Smith wrote:
> > > OK, it's been in devel for a while now and I'm soliciting comments on
> > > whether
> > >
> > > (a) devel users think the GCC 3 migration is complete and ready for the
> > > test branch
> > > (b) whether test branch users are ready for GCC 3.
> > >
> > > If I don't hear to the contrary I'll assume all is well and roll it out
> > > in my next update.
> > >
> > > Tony.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9NZvboTgdT9hhlCIRAgM0AKCTAer0diswcZof5eZTZh8OwFOccQCdHzzI
nbWHevN46gWiZ/k54OAnMak=
=RFH5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Eric Sandall, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.