sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Viggo Holmsen <vholmsen AT online.no>
- To: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>, Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:59:30 +0200
- GCC 3.1.1 will be unmaintained ! No further patches will be made available
for the 3.1.x codeline, as explained in the gcc-mailinglists.
- Viggo
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 18:49, Tony Smith wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 5:29 pm, Viggo Holmsen wrote:
> > I believe we should wait.
> >
> > 1) GCC 3.1.1 is planned for release on july 21 with bugfixes, but the
> > branch will be unmaintained after that.
> > I think we would be better off by skipping GCC 3.1.1.
>
> Unmaintained, or just superceded? i.e. if a serious bug emerges will it be
> addressed in the 3.1.x codeline?
>
> > 2) GCC 3.2 is planned for release on july 23 and will be the actively
> > maintained branch. It will require a sorcery rebuild, since the C++ ABI
> > will be incompatible with 3.1.
>
> We'd have to do that anyway as Julian pointed out when we go to gcc 3.x.
>
> > 3) I think we should migrate to GCC 3.2 as soon as possible in the devel
> > grimoire, and let it filter down.
>
> OK, that's enough reasons for me. The test/stable branches will avoid GCC 3
> for a while longer.
>
> Tony.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Julian v. Bock, 07/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Eric Sandall, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jeremy Kolb, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Tony Smith, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Viggo Holmsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Jayce^, 07/17/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question., Jon Svendsen, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Mozilla GCC 3 bug question.,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Casey Harkins, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, Andrew Stitt, 07/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?, ryan . abrams, 07/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 3 anyone?,
Dufflebunk, 07/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.